Leo Tolstoy's "A Confession" - Spiritual Browbeating
Last Wednesday, in an uncharacteristic moment of weakness, I went to Borders and blew a little fortune on books. As I thumbed through the sundry titles, I finally settled on Leo Tolstoy’s A Confession and Other Religious Writings. And it has turned out, doubtless, to be one of my most astute purchases of the year.
A Confession is a relatively easy read in terms of volume, for it is mercifully short compared to the tome that is War and Peace. And Tolstoy’s unflinching intellectual candidness had me from the get-go. His acknowledgment of his spiritual detritus and hollowness was compelling:
"The place where he had thought faith to be had long been empty and that the words he spoke, the signs of the cross and genuflections he made in prayer, were essentially meaningless actions. Having recognized their meaningless he could no longer continue doing them."
The Cease And Desist Order On Intellectual Thought
Repetition without conviction and passion only breeds mindlessness. And so it is in church. After a while, things start getting contrived and ho-hum, and jadedness creeps in like a thief. Many times I'd sit in church holding the Communion cup and bread, and the prayer would waft through my ears like a platitudinous drone which leaves no impressionable content, and I ask, “What on earth am I doing here at 9.30am on a Sunday morning?”
Methinks a lot of Christians are like that. We are so attuned, so programmed to certain Christian behavioral modes that we stop questioning the meaning therein. It’s as if the Big Guy Upstairs has issued a Cease and Desist Order on all intellectual thought, and nothing apart from mental acquiescence would do. Do not accede to Doubt, cos that makes you a bad Christian! Badger it into submission!
Unwittingly, we are guilty of a helluva spiritual browbeating. Cos Doubt casts a pall of guilt over us, and calls into question whether our faith is the bedrock which we purport it to be. One of the greatest challenges which I have encountered is how to reconcile a faith that advocates belief in God no matter what, and being sufficiently honest to myself that I have not addled my brains when I claim something as preposterous as the fish swallowing Jonah whole.
Thing is, I don’t believe there is such a thing as a spiritual shelf-life. It’s unlike in office, where you are accorded a honeymoon period to be a charmingly bumbling newbie, and thereafter if you still ask silly, simple questions people would cock an eyebrow and go, “You mean you don’t know this after being here all this while?” Methinks God loves it when we shuffle up to Him with our questions like a child, and He delights in unfolding in us Wisdom and Purpose.
The Unrosy Christian
For the longest time, I had thought faith, particularly Christian faith, engendered being upbeat Utopians with beatific smiles plastered on their plastic faces. And to a certain extent, I mock (and still do) this. Cos life is obviously not a bed of roses. Madeleine L’Engle summed it up nicely:
"Those who believe they believe in God but without passion in the heart, without anguish of mind, without uncertainty, without doubt, and even at times without despair, believe on in the idea of God, and not in God himself."
When I first read that, it was illuminating, literally. Doubt is not incongruent with faith!! In fact, it is precisely of Doubt that Faith exists. I don’t doubt that LiverPoo suck, so that’s not faith, that’s merely knowledge (and fact). For those deluded Poo supporters to claim that they’re still in with a shout for the title, now that’s Faith.
So we continue to struggle with doubt, with our indolence and avarices, and we continue to wrestle with the fibres of our beings that go contrary to Christ's teachings. And if despite all that we still believe in God - that's faith.
From A Pile Of Mud To A Beatles CD
So ask away. After all, if it is Truth, it would withstand the most congenital doubters. The Bible is not diametrically opposed to reason; in fact, there’s a tremendous amount of logic which undergirds Christianity. One of my favourite analogies is this:
"If you believe in Evolution, you’re essentially believing that this pile of mud and dirt here would eventually transform into a Beatles CD, Platinum Edition."
That’s an understatement, cos the differences between the befuddling complexities of the human body and the primitive chemicals in the primordial soup are far more accentuated than that between a pile of mud and a Beatles CD. And I quote from Walter L. Bradley:
"If you took all the carbon in the universe and... allowed it to chemically react at the most rapid rate possible, and left it for a billion years, the odds of creating just one functional protein molecule would be one chance in a 10 with 60 zeroes after it."
I can’t assert to be an expert on these theories; what I can’t fathom is how people can incontrovertibly believe in a theory which espouses a haphazard assemblage of chemicals to form living organisms, an occurrence which can only be possible against such astronomical odds and which provides no credible explanation for the meaning of Life itself, and yet dismiss Creationism as superstitious hogwash.
It takes a great deal of faith to believe in Evolution too, you know.
But back to Tolstoy. I’ve only finished the first few chapters, but it looks to be promising material. I intended to pen my thoughts on a few issues, but I realised that I have only touched on the first so methinks I better stop for now! Can’t wait to get back to my (paper) covers.
Tags: Leo Tolstoy, Tolstoy, A Confession, War And Peace, Christianity, God, Religion, Evolution, Darwinism, Creationism






























